Enterprise System Spectator blog: ERP and enterprise system vendor evaluation, selection, and implementation.

The Enterprise System Spectator

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Yet more outages at Salesforce.com

According to eWeek, Salesforce.com is not yet out of the woods with its service level problems. Customers report that the CRM on-demand pervice was down for several hours on January 30, and certain selected features have been unavailable from time to time during the month of January.

Wall Street takes note:
While the earlier outages have had little apparent effect on Salesforce.com's stock valuation, there are indications that "this morning's outage is apparently leading to more aggravated customer and prospect responses," analyst Michael Murphy wrote in a First Albany Capital Inc. market update.

From Salesforce.com customers' views, "the outage experience has transitioned from an isolated event into a recurring trend and the 'get out of jail free card' has been used," Murphy wrote.
Salesforce.com denies that the problems are as extensive as eWeek is reporting.

I think Salesforce.com is suffering from its success, as hundreds of new customers sign up each quarter. It reminds me of the problems that AOL had back with dial-up service in the 90s after it ramped up its marketing efforts. Eventually, AOL got the situation under control, but in the meantime there were many defections to competitors such as Earthlink.

Salesforce.com will eventually get its service levels back up to where they need to be. But in the meantime, how much damage will this do to Salesforce.com and to the software on-demand trend in general?

Update, Feb. 2. Computerworld has reactions from other users, many of which are not deeply concerned about service levels.

Related posts
Another service outage at Salesforce.com
Salesforce.com's credibility suffering from service outages

by Frank Scavo, 1/31/2006 11:59:00 AM | permalink | e-mail this!

Subscribe!

Read/post comments!
(1) Links to this post

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

Software industry predictions for 2006

Sandhill.com is running a good podcast regarding predictions for the software industry for 2006. Analysts M.R. Rangaswami, Erik Keller, and Vinnie Mirchandani provide the forecast. I'll summarize a few of the items that I think are right on the money:

Rangaswami believes that software as a service (or, software on-demand) will continue to thrive in 2006, although providers need to address service problems such as the recent outages at Salesforce.com. Kellerl points out, however, that buyers need to distinguish between software as a service as a license strategy (subscription pricing) and as a delivery strategy (hosted applications). He rightly points out that some vendors of on-premise software (e.g. SAS) have offered subscription pricing for years.

Erik Keller thinks that there will NOT be a big push to service-oriented architecture (SOA) anytime soon. He says, "The industry is not going to go off and spend a half-trillion dollars and make this upgrade in the next couple of years. No major vendor has given their customers a good reason to do the upgrade other than this techno-flash-babble about SOA being more flexible and more wonderful."

Keller also thinks that both Oracle and SAP are going to have a hard time meeting the growth expectations of Wall Street, primarily because customers do not have the maintenance budgets that these vendors need to grow. There's also concern about both vendors pushing customers into major upgrades that they just won't have the money for.

Mirchandani thinks that industry will finally be getting some relief from the tremendous burden of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) compliance. Corporate lobbying of Congress will finally result in some relaxing of the rules. The compliance burden is a hidden tax on U.S. companies that overseas providers do not have to pay.

You can listen to the whole podcast (about 35 minutes) for free at http://sandhill.com/opinion/editorial.php?id=64.

Related posts
Software on demand: attacking the cost structure of business systems
High software maintenance fees and what to do about them
Sarbanes-Oxley: stop the insanity

by Frank Scavo, 1/25/2006 10:09:00 AM | permalink | e-mail this!

Subscribe!

Read/post comments!
(0) Links to this post

Friday, January 20, 2006

Is Oracle's Fusion really half complete?

Josh Greenbaum attended Oracle's briefing on Project Fusion, where co-president Charles Phillips said that Oracle is "half-way to Fusion." Josh thinks that Fusion is more like 25 percent complete, based on a start date of January 2005 (when Oracle acquired PeopleSoft) and Oracle's projected completion date of 2008.

Josh is also questioning the timeline based upon the fact that Oracle is counting on functionality from acquisitions to fill out Fusion:
I'm still very pessimistic about these dates, mostly because I still see a lot of unfinished business that I'm not sure can be resolved in time. One of the main issues is CRM: with the Siebel acquisition still not closed, it's hard to imagine that Fusion CRM, and the all-important customer record and vertical functionality that are supposed to be coming from Siebel, will also be delivered in this 2008 timeframe.

Then there's all those yet-to-be-acquired vertical applications that are supposed to propel Fusion into serious competition with SAP's vertical functionality. I’m not sure how you can deliver by 2008 something you haven't even tried to buy, much less integrate. Call me negative, but it's hard to imagine that Oracle is anywhere near half-way to its stated goal of a broadly verticalized product suite.
Read the whole article on Datamation.

Related posts
JDE users want Oracle's Fusion to support IBM technology
Brawl continues between Oracle and SAP
SAP slams Oracle's strategy as, Project Confusion

by Frank Scavo, 1/20/2006 09:35:00 AM | permalink | e-mail this!

Subscribe!

Read/post comments!
(3) Links to this post

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Another service outage at Salesforce.com

Salesforce.com is not out of the woods yet with service reliability. In December, many customers in the U.S. were down for approximately five hours due to database problems in one of its network centers.

Now, apparently, many of its customers in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, suffered an outage earlier this month.

News of the most recent outages come at a particularly bad time as Salesforce.com is
in the midst of releasing its "Winter '06" product suite, which includes a service dubbed Mirrorforce for disaster recovery.

I'm assuming that eventually Salesforce.com will get its act together with its redundant data centers, but in the meantime these service disruptions are going to slow the company's progress. As I've said in the past, one of the major attractions to the software on-demand model is that it frees the customer from having to worry about things like backups and disaster recovery. But these recent outages take away from that selling proposition.

eWeek has more.

Update, Jan. 18. Salesforce.com CEO Marc Benioff commented on the recent service outages yesterday. According to CNET,
Benioff, who has commented little about the incident publicly, said in an interview at a media and customer event here that outages are an inevitable part of computing and that they happen very rarely at Salesforce.

"We don't want outages and we're doing everything we can not to have them, but we'll occasionally have them," he said. "That's part of computing...nothing runs at 100 percent availability."
Not the right answer. Fortunately, Salesforce.com is taking a more proactive approach than Benioff's defensiveness would indicate. The firm is in the midst of rolling out a major infrastructure upgrade that includes database mirroring and instant failover from one data center to another in the event of a disruption.

Related posts
Salesforce.com's credibility suffering from service outages

by Frank Scavo, 1/17/2006 12:22:00 PM | permalink | e-mail this!

Subscribe!

Read/post comments!
(0) Links to this post

Sunday, January 15, 2006

Quickpoll: IT spending on maintenance vs. new development

Companies are always asking the IT organization to do more with limited budgets. But much of the IT budget is spent just to maintain existing systems and capabilities. How much? We'd like to know.

At Computer Economics, we're running a new quick poll to try to get a handle on how much of the IT budget is going toward maintenance of existing systems.

Help us out by taking the poll now, in the right hand column of the Computer Economics website. It will just take five seconds. We'll write up our analysis of the results next month.

by Frank Scavo, 1/15/2006 04:35:00 PM | permalink | e-mail this!

Subscribe!

Read/post comments!
(0) Links to this post

Friday, January 06, 2006

Infor buying top asset management system vendor

Infor continues its acquisitions, the latest of which is Datastream Systems, one of the top vendors of enterprise asset management systems. The deal is expected to close in Q2 2006.

Datastream is a good catch for Infor. It has more than 6,700 customers in 140 countries, including (it claims) 60% of the Fortune 500. It has deep expertise in asset intensive industries, targeting sectors such as manufacturing, hospitality, health-care, transportation, telecom, facilities management, and government. Its primary offering, Datastream 7i is its new Web-based product, allowing users to view maintenance activities across multiple plants. Datastream is strong in asset tracking, work order management, scheduling, preventive maintenance, parts inventory, and MRO procurement. It is built on a service oriented architecture (SOA).

Datastream also has a separate e-procurement package (iProcure), which is integrated with 7i to provide automatic requisitioning of parts as reserved to maintenance orders, with access to catalogs of hundreds of MRO suppliers, plus support for internal catalogs.

Infor now has something like 30-plus individual software offerings. Infor's business model appears to be to let the software vendors that it acquires continue to be managed as standalone businesses, which could allow it to continue to acquire companies indefinitely. One has to wonder exactly where the economies of scale are, however.

Nevertheless, asset management is a high-value segment, and Datastream is a well-respected name in this space. Infor made a good move with this deal.

The press release has details.

Related posts
Infor to swallow half of Geac
Infor acquires Lilly Software: vendor consolidation continues
MAPICS agrees to acquisition by Infor

by Frank Scavo, 1/06/2006 04:19:00 PM | permalink | e-mail this!

Subscribe!

Read/post comments!
(1) Links to this post

Thursday, January 05, 2006

2005 Malware Report: The Impact of Malicious Code Attacks, now available

Computer Economics 2005 Malware Report: The Impact of Malicious Code Attacks
Over at Computer Economics, our latest study, the 2005 Malware Report: The Impact of Malicious Code Attacks is now available.

This report, which is widely referenced in the business press, breaks down the total financial impact malware on businesses by type of cost, based on our interviews and surveys of IT security professionals over the past year. It also highlights the major malware events of 2005, and tracks the worldwide economic impact of viruses, worms, Trojans, and other malicious code attacks since 1999.

IT executives will find this study a good source of economic statistics for justifying new IT investments that harden the IT infrastructure against malware attacks.

by Frank Scavo, 1/05/2006 01:12:00 AM | permalink | e-mail this!

Subscribe!

Read/post comments!
(0) Links to this post

Wednesday, January 04, 2006

Warehouse management system prices falling for small companies

It appears that prices have been falling dramatically for warehouse management systems (WMS) over the past several years, for software, hardware (scanners, label printers, RF guns, etc.) and even services, to the point where WMS solutions are genuinely affordable for small companies.

Steve Banker at ARC Advisory Group writes recently,
The price for solutions for small companies can be startlingly low. ARC talked to 6 suppliers who have an average selling price for software licenses of less than $50,000 for this segment. These solutions would also typically require an implementation fee of roughly $1,500 per day. Implementations would range from about 3 days for a simple, prepackaged solution to about 40 days for a more functionally rich solution.
My consulting firm, Strativa, has some direct insight as well. We recently conducted an IT due diligence exercise for a private equity firm. The investment target is wholesale distribution firm with under $50 million in annual revenues. In the course of our due diligence we found that the company was about to implement a warehouse management system in three warehouses nationwide. We were pleased to find that management is only spending about $150,000 on the project, all-in. Hardware is about $60,000, which leaves $80,000 for software and implementation services, including integration into the company's Tier III ERP system. Furthermore, this is not a low-ball bid. The vendor has good references for this type of project and is on target to meet its budget.

WMS used to be a big ticket item for small wholesale distribution firms, but no longer. It's a welcome trend.

Related posts
Blocking and tackling in the warehouse
SSA is buying EXE Technologies

by Frank Scavo, 1/04/2006 08:11:00 AM | permalink | e-mail this!

Subscribe!

Read/post comments!
(0) Links to this post

Monday, January 02, 2006

Business impact of the MS Windows WMF vulnerability

If you haven't yet heard, hackers are beginning to exploit a zero-day flaw in the way Microsoft operating systems handle Windows Metafile Format (WMF) files, and malware exploiting this vulnerability is already circulating in the wild. As of this writing, Microsoft has not yet released a fix, but there are temporary workarounds available.

At Computer Economics, we've written a short research byte on the likely economic impact of such malware events on businesses.

Read it here: Microsoft WMF Vulnerability: Business Impact

by Frank Scavo, 1/02/2006 09:14:00 PM | permalink | e-mail this!

Subscribe!

Read/post comments!
(2) Links to this post

Powered by Blogger

(c) 2002-2014, Frank Scavo.

Independent analysis of issues and trends in enterprise applications software and the strengths, weaknesses, advantages, and disadvantages of the vendors that provide them.

About the Enterprise System Spectator.

Frank Scavo Send tips, rumors, gossip, and feedback to Frank Scavo at .

I'm interested in hearing about best practices, lessons learned, horror stories, and case studies of success or failure.

Selecting a new enterprise system can be a difficult decision. My consulting firm, Strativa, offers assistance that is independent and unbiased. For information on how we can help your organization make and carry out these decisions, write to me.

For reprint or distribution rights for content published on the Spectator, please contact me.


Go to latest postings

Custom Search

Join over 1,700 subscribers on the Spectator email list!
Max. 1-2 times/month.
Easy one-click to unsubscribe anytime.

Follow me on Twitter
My RSS feed

AddThis Feed Button


Computer Economics
ERP Support Staffing Ratios
Outsourcing Statistics
IT Spending and Staffing Benchmarks
IT Staffing Ratios
IT Management Best Practices
Worldwide Technology Trends
IT Salary Report

Get these headlines on your site, free!


Awards

2013 Best ERP Writer - Winner

Alltop. We're kind of a big deal.
 
Constant Contact 2010 All Star Technobabble Top 100 Analyst Blogs


Blog Roll and Favorite Sites
Strativa: ERP software vendor evaluation, selection, and implementation consultants, California
StreetWolf: Digital creative studio specializing in web, mobile and social applications
Vinnie Mirchandani: The Deal Architect
Si Chen's Open Source Strategies
diginomica
CISO Handbook


Spectator Archives
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
September 2012
October 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
September 2013
October 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
Latest postings